Saturday, December 24, 2022

Yule Review: The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus

 A version of this article appeared in Knights of the Dinner Table #170 (December, 2010).


The circle of the world has turned and Yule is come again. In the Northern Hemisphere the light has slowly been declining until the shortest day of the year arrives, and the longest night. Bells tinkle and magic is in the air as so much of the Western World again descends into fantasy and childhood.

It's Christmas Eve! 

Despite the obvious links to fantasy inherent in so many Christmas traditions and tales, the holiday is stubbornly difficult for fantasy writers to handle successfully. Perhaps it is the broad, mass appeal of Christmas stories, its religious overtones, or its economic importance. Whatever the reason, precious few good, modern fantasy genre stories are set during the holidays, and even fewer successfully tackle its themes. The topic is generally abandoned to the authors of children’s book. In the 19th century, however, it was a common topic for prolific writers whose longevity and popularity have elevated them to icon status today.

L. Frank Baum is a prime example. Because he wrote for children and enjoyed mass appeal, the author of The Wizard of Oz is seldom thought of as a fantasy author, a status he shares with Peter Pan’s J.M. Barrie and Alice in Wonderland’s Lewis Carroll. Of course, all three were fantasy writers who built fantastical imaginary worlds that have directly influenced much modern fantasy, and fantasy roleplaying.

In 1902 Baum wrote The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus, which purported to provide Santa’s origin story, creating an elaborate and original mythology that includes traditional creatures such as nymphs, gnomes, and elves as well as original creations such as Ryls and Knooks. The story is set in the Forest of Burzee, described memorably by Baum:

Have you heard of the great Forest of Burzee? Nurse used to sing of it when I was a child. She sang of the big tree-trunks, standing close together, with their roots intertwining below the earth and their branches intertwining above it; of their rough coating of bark and queer, gnarled limbs; of the bushy foliage that roofed the entire forest, save where the sunbeams found a path through which to touch the ground in little spots and to cast weird and curious shadows over the mosses, the lichens and the drifts of dried leaves.

The Forest of Burzee is mighty and grand and awesome to those who steal beneath its shade. Coming from the sunlit meadows into its mazes it seems at first gloomy, then pleasant, and afterward filled with never-ending delights.

Baum carefully describes the ways in which all of the different aspects of the Santa tradition come into being, from reindeer to the first Christmas Tree. It’s all fanciful, and differs significantly from today’s better known traditions: for example Santa’s deer number ten rather than eight and are named Glossie,  Flossie, Racer, Pacer, Fearless, Peerless, Ready, Steady, Feckless, and Speckless, When Baum wrote Christmas traditions were less calcified, and he made full use of this creative freedom. 


Santa’s rise to greatness is not unopposed; a great battle is fought between the evil Awgwas and the immortals, Santa’s patrons. Santa himself is not involved in the battle, Baum is careful to maintain his essential purity and goodness, established firmly when the young Claus, finally exposed to the evils that so many children suffer after his own happy childhood in the Forest of Burzee, embarks upon his great quest to bring children happiness.

The Forest of Burzee, and Santa himself, are connected to Baum’s Oz legendarium in the 1909 novel The Road to Oz (the fifth Oz book), when Santa and his entourage come to Princess Ozma’s birthday party. The Forest, and Santa, appear in some of Baum’s short stories, especially “A Kidnapped Santa Claus” from 1904, a slightly darker tale which featured the Daemons of Selfishness, Envy, Hatred, Malice, and Repentance.

The fairy tale style of Life and Adventures of Santa Claus might put off players and game-masters from seeking inspiration in the tale, but in fact the mythology is a rich vein to mine for gaming nuggets. One limitation of the Christmas mythology, from a gaming perspective, has always been its close ties to the Christian religion. Baum’s tale presents a well reason Santa Claus figure in a mythology divorced from Christianity (though not hostile to it).  A game-master can thus introduce Santa and his accompanying mythology to a pagan campaign world without violating either logic or insulting a real world religion. Indeed, the Immortals make an excellent pantheon that a game-master could drop ready-made into any campaign with a strong element of faerie in its makeup.

Baum wrote the tale for children, but his prose is skillful if minimalist. It is filled with evocative images and memorable if quickly drawn characters. Discerning, open-minded adults should enjoy the pleasant tale and younger truly may truly love it. The novel has been adapted to the screen in two cartoons, and handles the transition well, Baum laved the theater and his writing retained a theatrical sense that encouraged such adaption.

Finally, like most of Baum’s work the tale is in the public domain. It can be found readily enough in various new editions, and is also available as a free download at Project Gutenberg.

The work was adapted into an interesting stop-motion animation holiday special by Rankin-Bass in 1985. It never attained the popularity of the other Rankin-Bass shows, but it has some remarkable images, the Great Ak especially is really dignified and impressive. And Universal produced a cartoon version as well in 2000, but I've never had an opportunity to watch it. 

Any figure as pervasive and influential as Santa Claus can carry the weight of multiple origin tales. Baum’s is a worthy contribution to the legend, and an excellent way to add a hint of mistletoe and holly to your fantasy gaming.



All views in this blog are my own and represent the views of no other person, organization, or institution.

Thursday, November 3, 2022

My "Off the Shelf" book reviews

 All views in this blog are my own and represent the views of no other person, organization, or institution.

And yet more crass self-promotion. From May 2006 through April 2013 I was the "Off the Shelf" columnist for Knights of the Dinner Table (aka KoDT), a comic book/game magazine published by Kenzer & Company. I wrote most of these columns during that period, but there were a handful, roughly one a year, written by others. Most of the columns were straight forward reviews, but I also wrote several as  review essays on several topics.


I felt that having a column like this was a privilege not to take lightly, and so I generally only reviewed works that I felt comfortable recommending to readers. I wanted to direct people to books worth reading rather then warn them from books that I may not have liked. After all, just because a work wasn't to my taste didn't mean others would not enjoy it. 

Because Knights of the Dinner Table was a comic and magazine aimed at table top roleplayers, I tried to include at least a paragraph in each review on what a gamer or gamemaster could pull from the work regarding inspiration and ideas for their games. 

One of my long term goals for ‘Off the Shelf’ was to work my way through the authors listed as ‘inspirational and educational reading’ in Appendix N of the 1st edition AD&D Dungeon Master’s Guide (p224, Gary Gygax, TSR (c) 1979). I didn't manage to get to them all, but I got to most of them. I wasn't always able or willing to review the books listed for the authors (some of them are fairly obscure today) so in some cases the author was listed but not the specific work I reviewed. I've marked works by Appendix N authors with a * at the end of the entry. In the years since I wrote my column, Appendix N has inspired many blogs and at least one rather bad IMO, book. A quick google search will turn all of these up, here is one example

The 1981 Tom Moldvay Dungeons & Dragons Basic Set included, on page 62, a bibliography of "Inspirational Source Material." I think it is actually a better, more comprehensive list than the more famous Appendix N (as do some others). I have indicated authors from that list with a # mark at the end of the entry.

In 2013 the editors brought on Noah Chinn to take over the column. Noah is an excellent author in his own right (I reviewed two of his books in the column) and a good friend of mine, he was an excellent choice to keep the column going. Noah has also been posting about his reviews since he took over the column. I encourage you to check out his work. 

Individual back issues of Knights of the Dinner Table magazine, including all of those listed below, can be found here for purchase.

KoDT #115 May 2006 Thieves’ World anthology series edited by Asprin and Abbey*# (revised and expanded here.) 

KoDT #117 July 2006 The Lankhmar aka Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser series by Fritz Leiber*#

KoDT #118 August 2006 The Corum Saga by Michael Moorcock*# (revised and expanded here.)

KoDT #119 September 2006 The History of Middle Earth and Unfinished Tales by J.R.R. Tolkien*#

KoDT #120 October 2006 Conan of Cimmeria by Robert E. Howard*# 

KoDT #121 November 2006 The Barsoom Series by Edgar Rice Burroughs*#

KoDT #122 December 2006 Black Seas of Infinity: The Best of H.P. Lovecraft *#

KoDT #123 January 2007 The King Must Die and The Bull from the Sea by Mary Renault#

KoDT #124 February 2007 The King of Elfland's Daughter by Lord Dunsany*#

KoDT #125 March 2007 Quag Keep by Andre Norton*#

KoDT #126 April 2007 Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell by Susanna Clarke 

KoDT #127 May 2007 Three Hearts and Three Lions by Poul Anderson*#

KoDT #128 June 2007 The Children of Húrin by J.R.R. Tolkien*#

KoDT #129 July 2007 The Prydain Chronicles by Lloyd Alexander#

KoDT #130 August 2007 A Rendezvous in Averoigne by Clark Ashton Smith#

KoDT #131 September 2007  Goblin Quest and Goblin Hero by Jim C. Hines 

KoDT #132 October 2007 The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova 

KoDT #133 November 2007 The Face in the Frost by John Bellairs*#

KoDT #135 January 2008 Tales of the Dying Earth (aka the Compleat Dying Earth) by Jack Vance 

KoDT #136 February 2008 His Majesty's Dragon by Naomi Novik 

KoDT #137 March 2008 The Dresden Files by Jim Butcher (revised and expanded here.)

KoDT #138 April 2008 Medieval Romances by Howard Pyle 

KoDT #139 May 2008 The Wardstone Chronicles aka The Last Apprentice by Joseph Delaney (revised and expanded here.)

KoDT #141 July 2008 That Hideous Strength by C.S. Lewis# (revised and expanded here.)

KoDT #142 August 2008 Flashman and the Redskins by George MacDonald Fraser 

KoDT #143 September 2008 The Last Mythal by Richard Baker 

KoDT #144 October 2008 Dracula by Bram Stoker# (revised and expanded here.)

KoDT #145 November 2008 Game Night by Jonny Nexus 

KoDT #146 December 2008 The Compleat Enchanter by L. Sprague de Camp and Fletcher Pratt*# 

KoDT #147 January 2009 The Club Dumas by Arturo Perez-Reverte 

KoDT #148 February 2009 The Merlin Trilogy by Mary Stewart# (revised and expanded here.)

KoDT #149 March 2009 Lankhmar Book 8: Swords Against the Shadowland by Robin Wayne Bailey 

KoDT #150 April 2009 "Important Fantasy Writers"  (revised and expanded here.)

KoDT #151 May 2009 The Han Solo Adventures by Brian Daley 

KoDT #152 June 2009 The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen by Alan Moore

KoDT #153 July 2009 The Wyvern's Spur by Kate Novak and Jeff Grubb 

KoDT #154 August 2009 The White Company by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle 

KoDT #155 September 2009 She by H. Rider Haggard#  

KoDT #156 October 2009 The Werewolf of Paris by Guy Endore 

KoDT #157 November 2009 The Ranger's Apprentice series by John Flanagan 

KoDT #158 December 2009 The Dark Is Rising series by Susan Cooper 

KoDT #159 January 2010 Peter & Max by Bill Willingham 

KoDT #160 February 2010 The Corps series by W.E.B. Griffin

KoDT #161 March 2010 The Legend of Sigrid and Gudrun by J.R.R. Tolkien*#

KoDT #163 May 2010 Shadow Hawk by Andre Norton*# 

KoDT #164 June 2010  The Moon Pool by Abraham Merritt*# 

KoDT #165 July 2010 The Last Seal by Richard Denning 

KoDT #166 August 2010 The Broken Sword by Poul Anderson*#

KoDT #167 September 2010 Wolf Brother by Michelle Paver 

KoDT #168 October 2010 Frankenstein by Mary Shelley 

KoDT #169 November 2010  Johannes Cabal: the Necromancer by Jonathan L. Howard 

KoDT #170 December 2010 The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus by L. Frank Baum#

KoDT #171 January 2011 Evermeet: Island of the Elves by Elaine Cunningham 

KoDT #172 February 2011 Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith by Matthew Stover and Star Wars: From the Adventures of Luke Skywalker by George Lucas and Alan Dean Foster 

KoDT #173 March 2011 The Magicians by Lev Grossman

KoDT #174 April 2011 The Original Shannara Trilogy by Terry Brooks

KoDT #175 May 2011 "AD&D Player's Handbook by Gary Gygax and others in a Genre Genesis article" aka "Genre Genesis: The Literary Foundations of Advanced Dungeons and Dragons in the Players Handbook"

KoDT #176 June 2011 "AD&D Dungeon Master's Guide and Monster Manual by Gary Gygax and others in a Genre Genesis article" aka "Genre Genesis: The Literary Foundations of Advanced Dungeons and Dragons in the Dungeon Master’s Guide & Monster Manual"

KoDT #178 August 2011 "Genre Genesis III" aka "Genre Genesis: The Literary Foundations of Advanced Dungeons and Dragons in the early AD&D Modules"

KoDT #179 September 2011 The Twilight Saga by Stephenie Meyer

KoDT #180 October 2011 Master of the Macabre (lesser works of Edgar Allan Poe) (revised and expanded here.)

KoDT #181 November 2011 Kwaidan: Stories and Studies of Strange Things and In Ghostly Japan by Lafcadio Hearn  

KoDT #182 December 2011 "Santa Claus in Fantasy Fiction" 

KoDT #183 January 2012 Bleeding Heart Yard aka A G**damned Love Story: The Curious Case of Bleeding Heart Yard by Noah Chinn

KoDT #184 February 2012 The Belgariad by David and Leigh Eddings

KoDT #185 March 2012 Swords Against the Darkness III edited by Andrew Offutt

KoDT #186 April 2012 The Doctor and the Kid by Mike Resnick

KoDT #187 May 2012 A Tale of the House of the Wolfings, and All the Kindreds of the Mark Written in Prose and in Verse by William Morris

KoDT #188 June 2012 Black Amazon of Mars by Leigh Brackett*#

KoDT #189 July 2012 Ready One Player by Ernest Cline

KoDT #190 August 2012 The White Raven by Diana L. Paxson

KoDT #191 September 2012 The Tempus novels aka the Sacred Band series by Janet Morris (revised and expanded here.)

KoDT #192 October 2012 A Guile of Dragons by James Enge

KoDT #193 November 2012 The Jewel of the Seven Stars by Bram Stoker#

KoDT #194 December 2012 Trooper #4 by Noah Chinn

KoDT #195 January 2013 The Lancashire Witches by William Harrison Ainsworth (revised and expanded here.)

KoDT #196 February 2013 The Express Diaries by Nick Marsh

KoDT #198 April 2013 Sanctuary by Lynn Abbey

It does seem fitting to me that I started and ended my tenure reviewing works from the Thieves' World setting.

 All views in this blog are my own and represent the views of no other person, organization, or institution.

Thursday, October 20, 2022

A Halloween Review: Dracula by Bram Stoker

 A version of this article appeared in Knights of the Dinner Table #144 (October, 2008).

From 2006 through 2012 I was the "Off the Shelf" columnist for Knights of the Dinner Table, a magazine and comic book devoted to tabletop fantasy role paying games. I reviewed classic and modern fantasy, horror, and science fiction novels. Every October I tried to review a work of classic horror in honor of Halloween. I am trying to restart that tradition with my blog.

Cover of Dracula, 13th Edition, 1919
Held by the British Library.

The air is cool and pumpkins again litter the countryside.  As the leaves turn and fall, a young man’s thoughts naturally turn to witches, ghosts, and vampires. And, of course, one considers the grand-daddy of all vampire tales, Dracula. The Count is one of the most pervasive characters in popular culture, appearing again and again in books, movies, music, even poetry. What remains to be said about a fictional figure over whom so much ink has already been spilled?

Little, perhaps, but one can always find value in the original sources of cultural icons. Though many folks know the broad outlines of Stoker’s novel, the many movie and stage versions have been far from faithful adaptations. The classic’s original impact may be rediscovered and understood more deeply against the backdrop of so many variations on its themes.

Bram Stoker was an Irish novelist and playwright of modest success.  His primary occupation was business manager of actor Henry Irving’s Lyceum Theater, but he produced many novels both before the 1897 publication of Dracula and after.  Perhaps the best known of these later works are the horror tales: The Jewel of Seven Stars (1903), The Lair of the White Worm (1911), The Lady of the Shroud (1909), and the posthumous short story collection, Dracula's Guest and Other Weird Stories (1914).  Sadly, none of these later attempts match the power or style of his masterpiece.

Dracula may be examined as a work of three parts, though Stoker does not clearly organize it so. Each part is defined by Dracula’s victim, or prey. In the first, he preys on Jonathon Harker, determined to drain him of his knowledge of London, and more. The next phase shifts, so suddenly that Harker’s final fate remains unknown, to Lucy, Dracula’s most tragic victim.  Within this long section all of the principle characters are fully introduced as Lucy’s friends and suitors struggle to save her from the diabolical count. In the final part of the novel, the victim is now Mina, and action revolves around the struggle to free her, and destroy the Count.  

The novel is written in an unusual style, as it purports to be merely a collection of letters, newspaper clippings, and journal entries written or collected by the participants in order to record the terrible, fateful events they observed. It is an extremely effective literary device, which allows the authorial point of view to shift smoothly from character to character while increasing the sense of tension and the importance of time. And Stoker is quite aware of time, carefully knitting his plot together so that dates match up exactly. 

Yet the device does not lessen the power of Stoker’s prose.  Consider the following passage:

On the bed beside the window lay Jonathan Harker, his face flushed and breathing heavily as though in a stupor. Kneeling on the near edge of the bed facing outwards was the white-clad figure of his wife. By her side stood a tall, thin man, clad in black. His face was turned from us, but the instant we saw we all recognized the Count, in every way, even to the scar on his forehead. With his left hand he held both Mrs. Harker’s hands, keeping them away with her arms at full tension. His right hand gripped her by the back of the neck, forcing her face down on his bosom. Her white nightdress was smeared with blood, and a thin stream trickled down the man’s bare chest which was shown by his torn-open dress. The attitude of the two had a terrible resemblance to a child forcing a kitten’s nose into a saucer of milk to compel it to drink. 

The impact of Dracula’s appearance is heightened by the first person account, yet it is clear that unlike later writers, Stoker sees the vampire as a dangerous predator, a rapist. The love story between Mina and Dracula found in so many adaptations is completely missing from Stoker’s original tale, yet the novel is filled with love stories. First those between Lucy and her three suitors: Lord Godalming, Dr. Seward, and Quincy Morris, then later the love between Jonathon and Mina Harker. But these loves are the talisman against Dracula’s evil, not a means for his seductions.

Dracula’s mysteries, and subsequently his aura of fear and horror, are heightened by the literary device as well. Dracula leaves no journal entries, no record of his thoughts or feelings. We see him as the protagonists see him: a malevolent force of unfathomable evil. He appears rarely, aside from his initial introduction when Jonathon Harker spends considerable time in conversation with the Count. Then, when the introductory meetings have concluded, he becomes a shadowy figure of unknown whereabouts and means. The reader never knows more than the protagonists, and the tension increases accordingly. 

For gamers, Stoker’s novel is a must read. The characters are well formed and provide potent archetypes for players in horror campaigns. Dracula himself is the icon of the ‘big bad’ or main villain in a campaign and Stoker’s masterful handling of his villain provides a GM with both inspiration and specific ideas. And the lessons do not only apply to running vampire villains. Finally, the literary device of journals and letters can be gainfully borrowed by role playing campaigns regardless of genre.  Having your players write letters or journal entries between sessions is a certain way to increase roleplaying and atmosphere.

Stoker's novel has long been in the public domain and can be found in many places. Several versions are available on Project Gutenberg and on LibriVox.

Stoker’s original novel is a lush cornucopia of fear, lust, courage, and love. A rainy October day spent reading Dracula is time horrifically well spent.    

All views in this blog are my own and represent the views of no other person, organization, or institution.

Monday, September 19, 2022

My History Talks

 All views in this blog are my own and represent the views of no other person, organization, or institution.

This is more crass self-promotion, but if I don't promote myself my voice just dies unheard in the wilderness. Perhaps its proper fate but anyway... I thought a post letting people know where to find my talks and interviews might be of interest. I'll up date this as I give more talks and interviews. 

These are all talks on historical subjects, that were recorded and have been preserved on the web, I've given many talks over the years that were unrecorded. 

Presentations:

“Mountain Storm: Counter-insurgency and the Marine Air-Ground Task Force” Presented at Landpower Conference sponsored by the US Army War College, December 2-4, 2015

The following three talks were all given at the Historicon War College in July 2019. Videos of most of the other presentations can be found here

"Firepower & Mobility - Archery in Ancient Warfare"Examining the role of archery in ancient warfare in the Mediterranean and Europe, including the factors that encouraged, and discouraged, missile warfare in societies.

"The History of War Gaming" - The history of war gaming from its earliest days in the ancient world through computer simulations, focusing on the ways commercial wargames and military training wargames have inspired each other.

"Ethical War gaming: A Discussion" - A discussion on how best to deal with ethical ‘landmines’; such as wargaming groups like the SS; or, when is it ‘too soon’ to wargame a conflict?

Interviews & Podcasts:


I provided the narration and historical content for this Marine Corps video commemorating the Battle of Cuzco Well. 


A talk about the transition of the Marine Corps from colonial infantry at the end of World War I in 1918 to an amphibious force at the start of World War II on Dec. 7, 1941. 

A short talk on Maj. Alan Shapley and 1st Lt. George Cannon, two officers among the many Marines cited for gallantry during the surprise attacks at Pearl Harbor and Midway on Dec. 7, 1941.

"Eagles, Globes, and Anchors – 20.Maritime Strategic Thought"

Breanne Robertson and I were interviewed about the book we co-edited, The Legacy of American Naval Power: Reinvigorating Maritime Strategic Thought, an Anthology (2019). 

I was interviewed for the Seminole Wars podcast about the Marine corps' involvement in those conflicts. The long interview was split into two podcasts:

"SW0106 Marines Earned Sea Legs in the US Frigate Navy; Engaged British, Pirates, Creeks and Seminole on Florida’s Early 1800s Gulf Coast"

"SW0107 Marines Escape Andrew Jackson’s Wrath with Timely Florida War Deployment; Show Great Value on Land/Swamps in Second Seminole War"

All views in this blog are my own and represent the views of no other person, organization, or institution.

Sunday, September 4, 2022

The Rings of Power & Understanding Tolkien's works

"Halls of Manwe on the Mountains
of the World above Faerie"
 by J.R.R. Tolkien
 Well, I tried to watch The Lord of the Rings: The Rings  of Power on Amazon Prime. I had to give up after about ten minutes, because it was very clear that the series was not based on Tolkien's work in any meaningful name.

I wanted to like this show. I was open to the idea of it. I think a good show telling the story of how Sauron created the Rings and corrupted Numenor could be told based on the outline Tolkien provided. Unfortunately, that isn't going to be this show. 

I want to be clear, I have no comments or complaints on the casting and the race of the actors involved is inconsequential. Discussion of the skin tone of dwarves or elves is simply a distraction. 

The show rewrites vast amounts of the back story of Middle Earth, and that fundamentally changes the nature of Middle Earth and the tales told of it. The journey of the elves from Valinor to Middle Earth has different motives and backgrounds, and the background and history of the elves themselves is clearly different. The personal histories of Galadriel and her brother were altered dramatically. And the Valar, who give their name to Valinor, were not mentioned at all. 

In short, within ten minutes the producers showed quickly that they had no respect for Tolkien's work, nor did they feel any obligation to remain true to it, whatever they might claim while promoting their series. 

This has been common for Tolkien adaptions over the years. In the 1960s an obscure loophole in U.S. copyright law at the time allowed an American publisher to print unauthorized copies of The Lord of the Rings in paperback. Tolkien and his publishers responded in various ways, most famously, Tolkien wrote the following for the covers of the authorized, newly copyrighted editions they rushed into print: "This paperback edition, and no other, has been published with my consent and cooperation. Those who approve of courtesy (at least) to living authors will purchase it and no other." The situations are not completely analogous but they are similar enough, in my opinion, that I shall apply the same remedy.

I will not watch any more of this show. 

In his forward to the second edition of The Lord of the Rings, Tolkien said, "Some who have read the book, or at any rate have reviewed it, have found it boring, absurd, or contemptible, and I have no cause to complain, since I have similar opinions of their works, or of the kinds of writing that they evidently prefer.” I find I cannot take Tolkien's even-handed approach. Frankly, I wish it didn't exist. Whether it is a success or a failure, it will prevent other Tolkien adaptions from being made. I see no positives from this, only a furtherance of the mediocrity of thought and art which characterizes so much corporate media these days. 

For those who wish to understand more of Tolkien's vision away from the show, I do have some suggestions. You should start by reading The Hobbit, The Lord of the Rings, and The Silmarillion.  There is no substitute for reading his works, of course. I have always found them life changing. 

However, there is an overwhelming amount of material by Tolkien and about Tolkien, Middle Earth criticism can be a very confusing field. I'm a Tolkien enthusiast rather then a true expert by my own estimation, but there are three shorter works of his that I believe are the key to really understanding what he was trying to do. 

Two of these are his two landmark scholarly lectures, "On Fairy-Stories" and "Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics". They explain Tolkien's views on the purpose of fantasy writing and fiction in general. The third work is "Leaf by Niggle", a short story that is the closest thing to a deliberate allegory which Tolkien ever wrote, and is his most autobiographical work.  These three, relatively short works will help anyone who is interested and willing to put some work into it to understand not only Tolkien's own works, but it will help them understand all fiction, drama, and literature.

Reading Tolkien's original works is a soul-enriching activity in my opinion. Read some of his works rather then watching this new show. It is time much better spent.

All views in this blog are my own and represent the views of no other person, organization, or institution.




Monday, February 28, 2022

Introduction to The Nations at War & the Russo-Ukrainian War

 I mentioned in an earlier post that The Nations at War by Willis John Abbot (New York, Leslie-Judge Co., 1917) had a profound impact on my early development as a historian. And I began blogging the work chapter by chapter, but sadly I have not kept up with that and haven't written about it in well over a year.  The current conflict brought the work to mind again, however. Not only because the roots of the conflict go back to the First World War and beyond, but because I have always found the introduction to be particularly interesting, and it seems relevant today.  

It is hard for us to recall now, but there had not been a major land war in Europe in four decades when the first World War broke out. The continent had been at peace for a remarkably long period. Many thinkers claimed that war between modern, industrialized nations was impossible. The war surprised many people (though many others had expected, even craved, a conflict).

In his introduction Willis Abbot, the journalist author of the work, explained why so many thought a major war impossible in 1914:

The Nations at War: A Current History 
by Willis John Abbot
(New York, Leslie-Judge Co., 1917)
"FOR YEARS wise men had said that there could be no general European war. Despite the menace of
rival armaments they thought that the financial ties which bound all nations together were stronger than the political differences which tended to bring them into conflict. The tremendous power of international capital and credit exerted in every land and operating as a unit would certainly check any wasteful war. The bankers controlling the money and credit of the world would suppress the war-like ambitions of the crowned heads by locking up their strong-boxes.

So the wise men thought. But the event showed the bankers bowing low to the will of Kaiser, King, Emperor, and President. Not only did they lend more than twenty billions to the belligerents in the first two years of the war, but stood ready to lend more and more—for a price.

The world thought public opinion would check the war at the outset. Nobody wanted war—except those in high place who alone had the power to make or to avert it. But before public opinion could be expressed the invading columns were on the march, the guns were thundering and the heavy hand of military authority stilled any sound of public protest.

Men thought there would be no war because International Socialism would reduce the belligerent governments to impotence. For years the world had been told that the cause of labor was international, that the workingman's struggle against capitalism was the same in France as in Germany, in Italy as in Austria. With this greater warfare in progress, involving the well-being of the workingmen of all the world, no working man would be deluded into taking up arms against his fellows who happened to speak a different tongue or render fealty to a foreign state.

But at the test the internationalism of labor vanished as had the internationalism of capital.

A long war was impossible, we were told, because the greater destructiveness of modern weapons would make it impossible for human beings to sustain the shock of conflict. Every inventor of a new and peculiarly effective device for wholesale murder, for long time past, had been assuring the world that his first thought in inventing it had been to make war so horrible, so ruinous, that it would be abandoned in horror.

War, thereupon, responded to this theory by stimulating the invention of, and eagerly using asphyxiating gas, liquid fire, lachrymal bombs, armored tractors that crushed the wounded in their path while mowing down platoons of men with their perfectly protected machine guns. Aircraft were perfected— mainly that they might rain bombs upon inoffensive civilians; hospitals and schools being favorite targets. The submarine was developed to a point that outdid the imagination of Jules Verne and was employed largely to sink helpless merchantmen, often with utter disregard for the lives of their passengers whether belligerent or neutral.

One by one the forces which the world had relied upon to avert the calamity of a general war were swept away. The ties of finance, of commerce, of mutual interest, of common humanity, even of a common religion were broken. One War Lord, most vociferous of all in the claim that God was especially enlisted under his eagles, did not scruple to ally his Christian nation with the Turk, and exerted every influence to stir up all Islam to waging a Holy War on the Christian peoples of the world.

The lessons of this war should be political, not military. The world should learn not how to make perfect the art of devastating countries and slaughtering enemies but how to prevent the need, or the excuse for either."

The implied horror that Germany would side with an Islamic state and turn a jihad upon other "Christian" nations is a sign of those times. But sadly many of the reasons he gives for the failure of peace seem sadly appropriate today. It would be easy to read this, and look at the last few weeks and despair. But I hope people do not do so.

Because people did try to learn the lessons Abbot is talking about. They tried to put practical plans into effect, first with the League of Nations, and when that failed they tried again with the United Nations. And humans have tried again and again to add more frameworks for talk instead of war for resolving national differences. And there has been progress. The world has become more and more peaceful over the past decades. The shock of this invasion highlights that - it seems impossible to us all, because we have succeeded in reducing war. 

 Not everywhere or for everyone, sadly. And it is very easy, when one sees the dead children of the Ukraine, or Syria, or Iraq, or Afghanistan... well, it is so easy to despair. 

Please do not despair. Yes, we have failed to end war. That is not because man is inherently weak or wicked, it is because the problem is very, very hard. It requires humans to understand one another, and understanding another mind is the most difficult thing in the world. It requires trust and empathy, and those have always been in short supply. It has always been easier to destroy then to build.

After the First World War we tried to fix things, and made them just a bit better. And after the Second World War we did the same. When the Cold War ended we took another step, and the world improved again just a bit.  

I don't like to make predictions, the minds that are directing events are closed to me. But I do predict this, this war will end, and then we will again work to make things better. And eventually we will succeed at that. 

Just do not despair. 

All views in this blog are my own and represent the views of no other person, organization, or institution.

Sunday, February 27, 2022

Today's Thoughts on Russia's Invasion of the Ukraine

My Phd advisor and mentor, Dr John F Guilmartin (one of the wisest military historians I have ever known), often said there is no such thing as an unwinnable war, nor is there such a thing as an unlosable war.  Many expect the Ukraine to fall within days despite their fierce defense to date.  I make no predictions either way, there are simply too many variables. 

Russia's aggression of the Ukraine has been predictable for many years, though I can't think of any foreign policy pundits who thought it would get this aggressive and this dangerous. In large part because the slow, methodical hybrid war the Russians have practiced under Putin has been very successful. With this one move, Putin has gambled all of his successes over the past decades.

Now, he seems to be escalating to the nuclear option in response to sanctions. I think we need to dust off some of our WWIII escalation models of the 1980s - I'm seeing some disturbing parallels here. 

This is why I prefer history. It is far less terrifying to analyze cause and effect when the outcome is already known, and the dead are already dead. 

God, save the Ukraine and the rest of us. 

All views in this blog are my own and represent the views of no other person, organization, or institution.

Monday, January 17, 2022

Some thoughts on Socrates & Plato

The Debate of Socrates and Aspasia by Nicolas-André Monsiau.



We cannot help but see Socrates as the turning-point, the vortex of world history.
—Friedrich Nietzsche, in The Birth of Tragedy (1872), p. 73

I really enjoyed my 'deep dive' into CS Lewis and his fiction during the summer of 2019. I decided to do something similar in the summer of 2020, looking at Socrates & Plato. It turned out to be a more difficult project, not in terms of reading but in terms of getting my head around the subject. In the end, I limited myself to Socrates, looking at Plato beyond his role as Socrates' recorder was just too much for a summer.  My plan was to read some of the dialogues, some of Aristophanes' plays in which they appear, and some biographies. I intended to focus on Socrates and Plato as people, their thinking on rhetoric, and reexamining my past in-depth readings in the dialogues, which were 30 years ago.

I started my Summer of Socrates by reading Rosamond K Sprague's edition of Plato: Laches and Charmides, which I still had from my days as an undergrad. I'd forgotten how much I enjoyed Laches. Charmides was more shocking, as I had forgotten how blatant it is about Socrates' 


homosexuality (the dialogue is framed as Socrates trying to seduce a young man noted for his beauty - but note other sources argue Socrates restrained himself from sex). Also, it takes place at a palaestra, reminding me that, somewhat ironically, Socrates and Plato were both jocks.

[Edit: The homosexuality isn't shocking. What shocked me was how bawdy and blatant it was, the "locker room" of it.  It would have been equally shocking if Socrates was drooling over a young woman. This level of bawdiness wouldn't be out of place in one of Aristophanes' plays, but just felt odd in a Socratic dialogue -  which undoubtedly says something about me, because I had read this dialogue before and I should not have been surprised by it.]

Rereading these really highlighted a couple things for me. One, is that language impacts this even more then usual. I compared two different translations, an old, 19th century translation and Sprague's much newer one.  There were definite differences that impacted Plato's meaning.  The modern translation made the sexual connotations of Socrates' interest in Charmides more apparent. I would like to know more about the exact Greek word used for 'courage' and what shades of meaning it has. In Charmides, the virtue being defined is usually translated as 'temperance', but the actual Greek word is  'sophrosyne' which clearly means much more then temperance or even moderation. In both cases it is clear the goal is not to define that one virtue, but to define Virtue itself.  

I was also struck by how much lack of context left the works untethered historically. The 'characters' in the dialogues are all historical personages, prominent Athenians whose reputations are supposed to inform our understanding of the dialogue. Nicias was one of the commanders of the infamous Sicilian expedition renowned for his caution. Laches was one of the commanders who lost the Battle of Mantinea. In Charmides, both Charmides and Critias were infamous as members of the 30 Tyrants. None of this is mentioned in either dialogue. 

I then turned to another of my old undergrad works, Aristophanes: Lysistrata/The Archanians/The Clouds, translated by Alan Sommerstein. I love Aristophanes' plays, which are earthy, funny, and really help you see how the Athenians were real people (who liked dirty jokes), humanizing them in ways that are often needed as our study of the past can transform them into metaphorical marble statues. Only The Clouds dealt specifically with Socrates, and I'd forgotten how annoyed The Clouds made me, because the Socrates who appears within that work is so utterly different from the Socrates we find in Plato's dialogues, literally espousing opposite opinions. But it is important to see how his contemporaries viewed him.

I turned next to Why Socrates Died: Dispelling the Myths by Robin Waterfield. This work challenged by preconceptions of Socrates and helped me put him firmly back into the context of his life, within Athenian history. It was well written and often convincing. For example, his description of Athenian religion placed the impiety charge of which Socrates was convicted in its proper context, reminding us that religion and patriotism were linked in Athens (it is still dominating our political thought today). 

The weakest section of the book was a long digression into Athenian politics and Alcibiades where Socrates barely appears at all. It provides context, but a work on Socrates should not have long stretches with no mention of the philosopher.  Waterfield's interesting twist is that he makes a case that Socrates' conviction and execution were, by Athenian standards of the day, justified. It boils down to what one thinks of Socrates' role, if any, in the rule of the the 30 Tyrants.  Plato, writing long after the fact, positioned Socrates as a foe of the Tyrants, but in the same source he mentions that many of them were friends and relatives of Plato (and friends and students of Socrates as well). As Waterfield points out, that is hardly a convincing case, and it is easy to see how Socrates could be associated with Tyrants. 

Then Waterfield pivots again at the very end, this time to the Thargelia. This reminds us that not only was Athenian society steeped in religion in ways we find difficult to understand (as permeated by religion as modern America is by commercialism) but also that ancient religion was literally blood soaked, even "rational" Athens still practiced essentially human sacrifice (though perhaps it was ceremonial). This ends the work with the idea that Socrates is just a scapegoat, that his trial is similar to the Thargelia if less ritualized. 

I found myself with new questions after reading Waterfield's work, I wondered if Socrates SHOULD bear some blame for Alcibiades, Critias, and the Thirty Tyrants. Did his teachings lead some to mass murder? His defenders, Xenophon and Plato, argued after the fact he was not connected to their excesses but obviously biased defenses long after the fact should not be wholly convincing. I tried to deeply rethink my understanding of Socrates -- perhaps he drank the hemlock cup because he knew he deserved it. But perhaps not, as a friend pointed out to me, Socrates' teachings do not really support their actions. In the Meno, for example, he "shows that the non-citizen slave - with the right training - is just as capable of the Socratic method as a free citizen." The more I consider it, the less convinced I am of any of Waterfield's arguments. 

The next book in my deep dive didn't help much. Plato's Republic by Simon Blackburn was not a
history at all, but an analysis of Plato's ideas by someone who doesn't really like Plato very much.  A useful corrective, as Plato does get more then his share of hero worship but he allowed his own real-world politics into the mix too often.

My final book for the project was The Hemlock Cup by Bettany Hughes.  It is the best of the works I've read to date. It is a detailed history that frames the tale with his trial and execution (apparently that is irresistible to his biographers) but what Hughes highlights that Socrates is really 'donut' subject - tons of information available on the people and world around Socrates, but he himself is absent because he left no writings (the parallels with Jesus are striking).  In order to counter this absence, Hughes focuses on the archaeology, recreating Athens at each stage of Socrates' life as he would have seen and interacted with it, while inserting the documentary evidence we do have. It is brilliant, a technique I shall have to remember if faced with a similar donut subject myself in the future. 

The Hemlock Cup was a very good read, I definitely think I understand Socrates better having read it. It certainly gave me a better perspective and understanding when I turned to the final book in my Socratic 'deep dive':  Plato: Five Dialogues: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo translated by G.M.A. Grube. This is another reread of my undergrad textbooks, and it was interesting reading these dialogue translations after my previous readings.  

I was particularly struck by this bit: "Finally, I went to the craftsmen. For I was conscious of knowing practically nothing and I knew that I would find they had knowledge of many fine things. In this I was not mistaken … the good craftsmen seemed to me to have the same fault as the poets: each of them, because of his success at his craft, thought himself very wise in other most important pursuits, and this error overshadowed the wisdom they had." (Plato, Apology, 22.D) This reminds me a great deal of STEM types who assume history or other Humanities are 'easy' and blithely make pronouncements about those areas of studies despite their own relative ignorance.

The biggest takeaway I have from this "deep dive" is a better understanding of my personal ignorance regarding Socrates and Plato, as well our collective ignorance of Socrates character and thoughts. This is known as the Socratic Problem, and it has dogged scholars and philosophers for hundreds of years. Socrates left us no writings of his own, nor any hints of things he wrote that other writers mention. All we have are the writings of a few people who knew him personally. Of these, Aristophanes' comedies are the only contemporary writings. Two of his students, Plato and Xenophon, wrote extensively about him, but they wrote long after he was dead. Thus the "donut" status mentioned above. The broad consensus is that earlier Platonic dialogues are close to Socrates' authentic thoughts, especially when the match what is said of him in other sources. In later writings, like The Republic, Plato is using Socrates as a character to express his own philosophies.  

My "deep dive" into Socrates and Plato had shifted quite a bit as I delved into it. First, it was immediately clear the topic was way too huge for one summer of study, even for a cursory examination. So I abandoned Plato to focus on Socrates, who had always fascinated me more. But even Socrates on his own was far to large of a subject, and in the end, after a perfunctory look at his wider views, I was led by the books I read to focus on his place in Athenian politics and society.  I didn't come to many firm conclusions -- like so many of mankind's most influential thinkers much of his life remains shrouded in the unknowable -- but I learned a great deal.

Considering that many of mankind's greatest minds have grappled with Socrates and come to no firmer conclusions then I did after my light summer reading exploration, I'm fairly content with my conclusions. 

Last summer I was too buried in research and writing to do a "deep dive" on any subject other then my work. But I certainly hope I have an opportunity to do one this summer. 

All views in this blog are my own and represent the views of no other person, organization, or institution.

Saturday, January 1, 2022

What I read in 2021

Three years ago, a friend of mine posted a list of the books they had read in 2018, I thought it was a great idea so I've been posting such a list myself, first on Facebook, now on my blog. I find it a very useful exercise in self-reflection - though I suspect my kids see it as another example of my narcissism. 😏

Also, if anyone else makes such lists, I'd love to see them. Feel free to share the lists, or links to your lists, in the comments.😀

Looking over this year's list (see below), these trends stood out:


# of Rereads: 23 (I've marked rereads below with an *)
# Military History reads: 9 
# of fantasy works: 30
# by or about Tolkien: 4
# Forgotten Realms:  4
# of Marine reads: 3
# Frigate Navy period reads: 12
# Thieves' World & related: 1
# Matter of Britain works: 1
#Moorcock works: 7
# of Flashman & Prohaska reads: 6
# of holiday reads: 7

Some negative trends I noticed - far less Tolkien, Thieves World, and Matter of Britain (King Arthur) then has been usual for me and really no mythology works. I went especially hard on all of those the past two years, so I suppose that is why there are fewer reads here. My "deep dive" into Socrates and Plato in Summer 2020 wasn't matched with a similar deep dive of any sort this past summer, in part because I took over a year to post the blog entry on Socrates and Plato. I might do another of those deep dives in the future though, especially if work and family life calm down. 

I have fewer books here, just like last year, I think that is primarily due to the pandemic, I get a lot of reading down on the train when I commute, and I have been working at home more. I kinda hope that regular office hours will be back soon so my reading will again increase. 

I expected to read a lot of Mexican War and Seminole War, as well as other Frigate Navy periods works for my ongoing book project and I did. Of course, I actually read far more books then are listed here for that (easily 100+ separate books not counting articles and primary sources will be cited in its notes) but I didn't include "graduate student reads" here, only books that I sat and read cover to cover and fully digested. 

I also finished the full Prohaska series, which I adored. I wish there were more of those books. I also finished the Elric series, and the first Corum trilogy, rereading both decades later was interesting. I finally read the two latest volumes from Jim Butcher's Dresden Files as well.  The best surprise was the Johannes Cabal series, I still have one more book in that series which will help me kick off 2022. 

Looking forward, I still want to read Ken Follett's Century trilogy, but it is going to be very time consuming so I've been putting it off. I expect to do some travelling in the spring, that might be a good time to start. I've also had a yearning to reread the Harry Potter series, but I've been resisting because there are so many new works to read. I also want to reread the latter Thieves World books. More historical fiction, along the lines of Flashman and Prohaska are almost certainly in my future. 

I reread the exact same number of books this year, 23, as last.  I'm fairly comfortable with that number, especially since many were books I had read 20, 30, or even 40 years ago. I have slipped in my annual Tolkien rereads a bit, and I am comfortable with that, since I am still reading at least one of his works a year. I do want to read more new books, but I think this year's balance was about right. Rereading always reveals new details that didn't connect the first time through, but I also love being surprised by new stories.

Beyond that, I have fewer plans for my reading next year then this year. My current book project will be in the stage where the writing is refined, and I don't want to get locked in yet on what my next book will be, I don't want to get focused on one subject when I might need to get myself excited about a different subject and time period.